Frontally Mediated Control

Marsicano, G., Wotjak, C.T., Azad, S.C., Bisogno, T., Rammes, G., familiarity that the item is old without constructing a Cascio, M.G., Hermann, H., Tang, J., Hofmann, C., Zieglgansberger, vivid representation of the past episode. W., et al. (2002). Nature 418, 530–534. In source retrieval, the task directly requires the subMcGuire, S.E., Le, P.T., and Davis, R.L. (2001). Science 293, 1330– ject to remember context-specific details surrounding 1333. the items prior occurrence. For example, the subject Perez-Orive, J., Mazor, O., Turner, G.C., Cassenaer, S., Wilson, R.I., might be asked to remember whether the word ketchup and Laurent, G. (2002). Science 297, 359–365. was presented on the right or left side of a computer Rescorla, R.A. (2001). In Handbook of Contemporary Learning Theomonitor or whether one person or another said the word. ries (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum and Associates) pp. 119–154. Unlike simple item recognition, recollection of the study Schwaerzel, M., Heisenberg, M., and Zars, T. (2002). Neuron 35, this episode is required to solve the source retrieval task issue, 951–960. because content details must be remembered. Source Tully, T., and Quinn, W.G. (1985). J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 157, 263–277. retrieval tasks typically take more time and are accomWaddell, S., and Quinn, W.G. (2001). Trends Genet. 17, 719–726. panied by a perception that the original study episode Zars, T., Fischer, M., Schulz, R., and Heisenberg, M. (2000). Science is being reexperienced. 288, 672–675. In their study, Dobbins et al. manipulated the source